Wednesday, 12 November 2014

A story of Butere Constituency; THE PAIN OF IGNORANCE AND NEGLIGENCE.

The Story That I have witnessed

When I was born, I was brought up in an environment where I knew questioning the elders was a taboo. I knew the good life was being a subject and accepting guidance from those you saw to be "Bigger in size than you". This sorry state of my mind was not mine alone but of many from my village and agemets I interacted with at that time.

In my naive mind, I always associated success with certain families, individuals and friends. I doubt if I knew the definition success or rather even if I knew it existed. The life of plenty, pleasure and siphoning the best honey to me was unknown. But I wasn't sure to whom I would attribute this ignorance.

It is vivid in my memory that I must have known people like Martin Shikuku, George Amukowa Anangwe and The retired President Moi. I cannot forget that I knew the name of Raila too despite not knowing musch about him.

My life was coined and coiled in this little village where I could acquire probably everuthing.

My thought of political arena always gave me an impression of death, death, death and nothing but death. To me people engaging in politics and political arena at large were those who could kill anytime and take way your wealth just as they feel like. I liked Anangwe, a former served Butere MP by fact I used to hear people call him doctor, something I dreamt to be, but I hate him realizing he was a politician.

It was clear that politicians were responsible for all atrocities in my small world of imagination.

All I knew was if you happen to be in a house that water was leaking into, you were not supposed to question why or when repair will be, but take your small blanket and move to a small corner where it was not raining. But just in case you get someone else has occupied the corner, then persevere for that night and wait tomorrow to book that corner first.


Thanks to the World,

 As I grew, I realized one thing, that
politicians were leaders, leaders needed by a society to drive change, spur development, and bring sense to a citizen like me, as I was by then on what government was. 
I learnt politicians were supposed to be good people to proclaim liberation and enhance good lives of their people.
Thanks to my dad who gave me opportunity to travel and tour the world to see further. I had an opportunity to explore, implore and visualize what these "politicians" thing was all about.

Yes, I learnt, I knew, I understood and I experienced, it is about the people, those people and the very people who vote them in.

Irony of My Knowledge.


But contrary to what I knew, I found the opposite in my locality. It is still the very opposite of my knowledge even to date. The locality of Butere constituency.

  • Where a CDF project is a Mabati shade for a span of three years.
  • Where  bursaries are awarded in speeches but in practices money freezed.
  • Where Bursaries are awarded to the poor, needy and the destitute in CDF reports but the rich benefit in real disbursements.
  • Where Bursaries are awarded to all students in the constituency in speeches in Barazaas and political rallies but in offices only selected cadres are awarded.
  • This is where a location remains with an assistant chief as the acting chief for years without promotion and no leader questions.
  • This is where the well being of the rich is first fended for at the cost of poor citizens.
Since when shall these happen?

There have been colourful speeches, promising slogans and voices of honour call for this liberation but has it ever come?

Chronic Ignorance,


It  remains apparent that the ignorance that our people suffered in 1963 at Independence is what our people still suffer to date.
How can you justify tarmacking of only one road in a spun of 50 years of independent rule?
How does one in his or her senses justify the poverty, Clan intolerance, unbuilt police houses, uncouth reserve policing, unconstcructed sources of safe water in a constituency whose icon is only presence on a national map?

If you can help me unravel this, I shall be grateful. 

Friday, 16 May 2014

BREAKING NEWS: AL-SHABAAB LEADER FINALLY SPEAKS.. THREATENS KENYA OF ANOTHER “WESTGATE” VERY SOON **EXCLUSIVE**


Mogadishu (Harar24) – In a 37-minute long audio message recorded by Al-Shabaab’s leader and released by Al-Shabaab’s media wing, the much feared leader sent chilling threats to Kenya & condolences to Kenyan Muslims in recent light of the crackdown against Kenayn Muslims and Somalis in particular.
In the Arabic audio message accompanied with English subtitles & video segments of the Kenyan violence against Kenyan Muslims, the Al-Shabaab leader taunts Kenya labeling the Kenyan invasion into Somalia as a “historical blunder”. The video shows graphic images of atrocities committed by the Kenyan government such as the well-known massacres that occurred at Garissa and Wagalla in the 1980’s, drawing parallels between the atrocities and the ongoing violence targeting Muslims in Nairobi & Mombasa.
“Do not simply tolerate the deaths of your scholars, violation of your mosques sanctity & the plundering of your wealth.” Said Abu Zubayr, leader of the Al-Qaeda linked group. “Do not stand by idly so that the historical massacres that were perpetrated against you do not return” added the militant leader, hinting at the Garissa & Wagalla massacres.
After outlining what he deemed as “oppression against Muslims”, the militant leader urged Kenyan Muslims to carry arms and to shun courts and parliaments, indicating that only the mighty are respected. “Don’t waste your time in front of their courts and pleading to their parliaments, for they do not respect except the powerful ones, and they do not comprehend any language except that of the gun” said Abu Zubayr in the message who accompanied the request for armed struggle with a chilling reminder & threat of Westgate-like attacks saying: “And the Westgate operation if not far off from you!”.
The audio messages glamorizes and eulogizes Muslim clerics who were believed to be assassinated by Kenyan anti-terror units, including the late clerics Abubakr “Makaburi” Sharif and Aboud Rogo who were assassinated in Mombasa. Both clerics were known for openly inciting Kenyan youth to go to Somalia as part of their religious duty and to defend themselves in Kenya by carrying arms.
The video features a clip where Makaburi predicts that he’ll be killed at the hands of Kenyan forces. “Follow the path of your Mujahideen scholars who openly claimed the truth & who were murdered by the Kenyan Special Forces” says Abu Zubayr directing his message towards Kenyan Muslim youth.
This latest recording of Al-Shabaab leader who’s known to frequently record messages in Somali and Arabic has gained the attention of analysts, who see this message as insight into the mindset of the militant leader who by sending guidelines & condolences to East African Muslims and global jihadists, promotes himself as the de-facto leader of Al-Qaeda in East Africa.

Saturday, 3 May 2014

Kenya's Counter-terrorism efforts comes under criticism from US

Armed police from the General Service Unit take cover behind a wall during a bout of gunfire outside the Westgate Mall in Nairobi, Kenya
The renowned United States of America(USA) has criticized Kenya’s efforts towards countering terrorism and violent extremism in the region and beyond.

In the 2013 report on country terrorism that was just released by her government, the US stated that some of the Kenyan civil society organizations worked actively to address the drivers of radicalization and violent extremism in Kenya, often with her(USA) assistance and other international partners.

“But the Government of Kenya is not engaged in significant efforts in such areas,” stated the report.

The USA, which regards Kenya in the report as an antedote in the fight against al-Shabaab and Al-Qaida, added that the September 2013 al-Shabaab attack on Nairobi’s Westgate Shopping Mall focused the world’s attention on Kenya and the East African country’s counter-terrorism efforts.

The report outlines that the Westgate attack highlighted significant shortcomings in the Kenyan security forces’ response.

About 70 people died during the attack.

The report further criticized Kenya’s inability to release a report on the Westgate attack months after the attack despite the promise made earlier on by the executive to release a report the soonest.



For More of this, Click here to Like My facebook page

“President Uhuru Kenyatta announced his intention to appoint a commission of inquiry into Westgate’s lapses and how we can avoid them in the future but no such report had been released publicly by year’s  end,” stated the report.

The report further criticized the government for not involving the civil society in its efforts to counter the financing of terrorism in Kenya.
You can follow on twitter, click here.

 - CAJ News
It however lauded the efforts that the country, kenya, had taken in this regard and of note by scrutinizing transactions through the popular mobile money transfer, M-Pesa.

“The Financial Reporting Centre-monitored mobile money transactions to a degree, especially the popular Safaricom M-pesa service, but did not engage with NGOs to file suspicious transaction reports,” it nonetheless stated. – CAJ News
You can Also Visit Here.

Thursday, 24 April 2014

What's the Place of Students in Society? Is the Duty of Students to Riot and Burn the Public?

From time to time students demonstrations have been viewed as the sources for moulding and practicing terrorism on the public. It has evolved to be apparent that there's no way that under the blue sky the authorities can give a go a head for a student peaceful demonstration when they are allowed to do so. This comes from the notion that this is usually a mission to burn public property, terrorize innocent Kenyans and kill the animals that come in the sight.
As if this being not enough, a good part of the society have been made to believe that the first training one gets after joining any university is how to riot, mob, and destroy. Where?
I have been lucky to attend matriculation of several universities here in Kenya and if there is anything highly condemned by both student leaders and administration is Rioting. a lot of emphasis is usually put on its demerits and what one can expect if he or she engages in such. But does the public recognize that?

WHO BURNS PUBLIC PROPERTY IN STUDENTS DEMONSTRATIONS?
As time goes, this notion has circulated so far among the Kenyan youths and its undebatable that most non students in the neighboring of academic institutions participate in the riots than students do. Speaking to NTV, Zaack Kinuthia the former SONU chairman was seen as a joker when he said this.
Those who have ever participated or if not participated, keenly observed the procession of some of these demonstrations can attest to this. Learning from the past, it can be remembered that in 2012 when one of the students was brutally murdered at the famous KM in the neighborhood of Kenyatta University, students were granted a permission to demonstrate peacefully within the university premises. This was well done by those who were leading all the way from KM to the gate singing and chanting mourning songs. But after they left the gate silently and satisfied they had mourned their colleague, unknown group of people lit fire along Thika superhighway tinting the name of this world class university.
Similar events have been observed in different institutions just to name few, Masinde muliro of Science and Technology, Kisii University among others.

The public has always come out to engage the students on peaceful riots either in capacity of police or fellow students. This character has circulated and can be observed that same is happening on online platforms where students engage in discussions of matters pertaining their stay in campuses. It's sad when you read a profile of someone without any student status engaging loudly intellectual minds on online platforms and criticizing what he or she understands least.

It's apparent that the society is continuing to create animosity between it and these young intellects who are yet to come out drive this economy. It will be more honorable and ample if the public shall refrain from engaging in what they understand least about students or consult first before engaging them. It's sad to see epitomes of knowledge, benchmarks of intellectualism and icons of prosperity branded all kind of names and titles they deserve least.

Let us give University students their rightful place in society.

WHAT WAS KALONZO’S INTENT IN HIS RESPONSE?


Former Vice President and CORD presidential running mate in the last years general elections Kalonzo Musyoka is in the eye of the storm by the public over comments he made today during a Press conference. Responding to a journalist question on presumed CORD failure, as the official opposition party in the last one year, to suggest solutions to mistakes it blames on the Government, Musyoka instead turned personal which has been seen as a tribal stand.
He chose to interrogate the journalist’s ethnicity by his name, derisively dismissing his question as inspired by his tribe and therefore, his assumed political leanings based on last elections voting blocks, famously “strongholds”. In Kalonzo’s words, the journalist’s name “betrays it all.” To his mindset, the name ‘Muriithi’ is predominant in Central Kenya, a region whose followers overwhelmingly voted for Jubilee coalition that is currently in power, Cord’s main rival.
This thinking is regrettably parochial. Coming from someone with declared ambition to be the country’s president, it betrays a shocking intolerance to members of community constituting part of the very same citizens Musyoka would wish to lead come 2017 or any other general election in the near future. In any case, the stereotype behind it is also fallacious. It assumes members of a community belong by default to obvious political grouping which is not the case to an intellectual analyst. There is plenty of evidence that there are many Kenyans who have challenged this political herd mentality, including prominent members of Musyoka’s Cord coalition.
However, it should also be noted that as much as we may interpret this as a tribal sentiment, our backgrounds and understanding of our local names vary. Most of local names that we Africans get have a unique meaning which in most cases is usually only known to the members of such a locality. Our we send our sentiments and views, it’s therefore worth that we listen keenly what was Kalonzo’s intent in his message to the journalist before giving our very own interpretation.

Monday, 16 December 2013

WHY MANDELA NEVER FORGAAVE HIS WIFE WINNIE;

Nelson Mandela 1918-2013
Once we began our interview. Winnie took on just such a role, playing the tremulous bride-to-be, convincing me she was in a state of nervous excitement at the prospect of rekindling her life’s great love.
Close up she had, like her husband, the charisma of the vastly self-confident, and there was a coquettish, eye-fluttering sensuality about her. It was not hard to imagine how the young woman who met Mandela one rainy evening in 1957 had struck him, as he would later confess, like a thunderbolt.
The Mandela the world saw wore a mask that disguised his private feelings, presenting himself as a fearless hero, immune to ordinary human weakness. His effectiveness as a leader hung, he believed, on keeping that public mask from cracking. Winnie offered the greatest test to his resolve. During the following years the mask cracked only twice. She was the cause both times.
The first was in May 1991. She had just been convicted at Johannesburg’s Rand Supreme Court of assault and accessory to kidnapping a 14-year-old black boy called Stomple Moeketsi, whom her driver had subsequently murdered. Winnie had been led to believe, falsely as it turned out, that the boy had been working as a spy for the apartheid state.
Winnie and Mandela walked together down the steps of the grand court building. Once again the actress, she swaggered to the street, right fist raised in triumph. It was not clear what she could possibly have been celebrating, except perhaps the perplexing straight off to jail and would remain free pending an appeal.
Mandela had a different grasp of the situation. His face was grey, his eyes were downcast.
The second and last time was nearly a year later. The setting was an evening press conference hastily summoned at the drab headquarters of the ANC. He shuffled into the room, sat down at a table and read from a piece of paper, beginning by paying tribute to his wife.
“During the two decades I spent on Robben Island she was an indispensable pillar of support and comfort… My love for her remains undiminished.” There was a general intake of breath. Then he continued: “We have mutually agreed that a separation would be the best for each of us… I part from my wife with no recriminations. I embrace her with all the love and affection I have nursed for her inside and outside prison from the moment I first met her.”
He rose to his feet. “Ladies and gentlemen. I hope you ‘ll appreciate the pain I have gone through and I now end this interview.”
He exited the room, head-bowed, amid total silence.
Mandela’s love for Winnie had been, like many great loves, a kind of madness, all the more so in his case as it was founded more on a fantasy that he had kept alive for 27 years in prison than on the brief time they had actually spent together. The demands of his political life before he was imprisoned were such that they had next to no experience of married life, as Winnie herself would confess to me that morning.
“I have never lived with Mandela,” she said. “I have never known what it was to have a close family where you sat around the table with husband and children. I have no such dear memories. When I gave birth to my children he was never there, even though he was not in jail at the time.”
It seemed that Winnie, who was 22 to his 38 when they met, had cast a spell on him. Or maybe he cast a spell on himself, needing to reconstruct those fleeting memories of her into a fantasy of tranquility where he sought refuge from the loneliness of prison life.
His letters to her from Robben Island revealed romantic, sensual side to his nature that no one but Winnie then knew. He recalled “the electric current” that “flushed” through his blood as he looked at her photograph and imagined their caresses.
The truth was that Winnie had had several lovers during Mandela’s long absence. In the months before his release, she had been having an affair with Dali Mpofu, a lawyer 30 years her junior and a member of her defence team. She carried on with the affair after Mandela left prison. ANC members close to Mandela knew that was going on, as they did about her frequent bouts of drunkenness. I tried asking them why they did not talk to Mandela about her waywardness, but I was always met by frosty stares. Winnie became a taboo subject within the ANC during the two years after Mandela left prison. Confronting him with the truth was a step too far for the freedom fighters of the ANC.
His impeccably courteous public persona acted as a coat of armour protecting the sorrowing man within. But there came a point when Mandela could deceive himself, or the public, no longer. Details of the affair with Mpofu were made luridly public in a newspaper report two weeks before the separation announcement.
The article was a devastating, irrefutable expose of Winnie’s affair. It was based on a letter she had written to Mpofu that revealed he had recently had a child with a woman whom she referred to as “a white hag.” Winnie accused Mpofu of “running around f***** at the slightest emotional excuse … Before I am through with you, you are going to learn a bit of honesty and sincerity and know what betrayal of one’s love means to a woman … Remember always how much you have hurt and humiliated me … I keep telling you the situation is deteriorating at home, you are not bothered because you are satisfying yourself every night with a woman. I won’t be your bloody fool, Dali.”
In private, Mandela had already endured quite enough conjugal torture. I learnt of one especially hurtful episode from a friend of Mandela some years later. Not long after the end of her trial, Winnie was due to fly to America on ANC-related business. She wanted to take Mpofu with her, and Mandela said she should not, Winnie agreed not to, but went with him anyway. Mandela phoned her at her hotel room in New York, and Mpofu answered the phone.
On the face of it, Mandela was a man more sinned against than sinning, but he did not see it that way. It was his belief that the original sin was to have put his political cause before his family.
Despite everything, Mandela believed when he left prison that he would find a way to reconcile political and family life. Some years after his separation from Winnie, I interviewed his close friend Amina Cashalia, who had known him since before he met Winnie.” His one great wish,” she told me, “was that he would come out of prison, and have a family life again with his wife and the children. Because he’s a great family man and I think he really wanted that more than anything else and he couldn’t have it.”
His fallout with Winnie only deepened the catastrophe, contaminating his relationships with other family members, among them his daughter Zindzi. She was a far more complicated character than I had imagined when I chatted with her cheerfully in her mother’s kitchen over fried eggs. At that very moment, in late January 1990, her current lover, the father of her third child, was in a prison cell. Five days later he hanged himself.
Zindzi was very much her mother’s daughter, inheriting her capacity to dissemble as well as her strength of personality. The unhappiness and sheer chaos that she would endure in her own private life, a mirror of her mother’s, found expression in a succession of tense episodes with her father after he was set free.
One of them took place before friends and family on the day of her marriage to the father of her fourth child, six months after her parents’ separation. It was a glittering occasion at Johannesburg’s swankiest hotel, with Zindzi radiant in a magnificent pearl and sequin bridal dress. It seemed to be a joyous celebration; in truth, it provided further evidence of the Mandela family’s dysfunctions.
One of the guests seated near the top table was Helen Suzman, the white liberal politician and good friend of Mandela. She told me that he went through the ceremonial motions with all the propriety one would have expected. He joined in the cutting of the wedding cake and played his part when the time came to give his speech, declaring, “She’s not mine now,” as fathers are supposed to do. He did not, however, mention Winnie in the speech. When he sat down, he looked silent and cheerless.
Maybe he had had time to reflect in the intervening six months on the depth of Winnie’s betrayal. For more details had emerged of her love affairs and of the crimes of the gang of young men “Winnie’s boys,” as they were known in Soweto – who played the role of both bodyguards and courtly retinue. They had killed at least three young black men, beaten up Winnie’s perceived enemies and raped ;young girls.
Whether Mandela chose to realise it at the time, he was the reason that Winnie never ended up going to jail. Some years later, the minister of justice and the chief of national intelligence admitted to me that they had conveyed a message to the relevant members of the judiciary to show Winnie leniency.
Mandela’s mental and emotional wellbeing were essential to the success of the negotiations between the government and the ANC; for him to bow out of the process could have had catastrophic consequences for the country as a whole. Jailing Winnie would be too grave a risk.
Bizarrely, one of the guests at Zindzi’s wedding, prominently positioned near the top table, was the “white hag” Winnie had derided in her letter to Mpofu, and she was sitting next to a man I know to be another former lover of Winnie’s.
It also would have been difficult for Mandela to miss the menacing glances Winnie cast towards the “hag” although I hope he missed the moment when Winnie brushed past her and hissed at her former lover: “Go on! Take her ! Take her!”
When the band struck up and the newly married couple got up to dance, Mandela, who had been standing up, turned his back on Winnie and returned stiffly to the top table. Grim-faced for the rest of the night, he treated Winnie as if she did not exist. At one point, Suzman passed him a note. “Smile, Nelson,” it said.
In October 1994, five months after Mandela had become president, I spoke to a friend of his, one of the few people in whom he confided the details of his marital difficulties. The friend leant over to me and said: “It’s amazing. He has forgiven all his political enemies, but he cannot forgive her.”
During their divorce proceedings a year and a half later, he made his feelings towards Winnie public at the Rand Supreme Court, where he had accompanied and supported Winnie during her trial in 1991.
As his lawyer would tell me later, he was arbitrarily generous about sharing his estate, giving Winnie what was more than fair. But he made his feelings bluntly known in the divorce hearing. Standing a few feet away from her, he addressed the judge, saying: “Can I put it simply, my lord? If the entire universe tried to persuade me to reconcile with the defendant. I would not … I am determined to get rid of this marriage.”
He did not shirk from describing before the court the disappointment and misery of married life after he returned from prison. Winnie, he explained, did not share his bed once in the two years after their reunion. “I was the loneliest man,” he said.
The Victorian poet Arthur Hugh Clough wrote about the “terrible notions of duty” that boost the public figure but can stunt the private man. It is impossible to avoid concluding that Mandela was far less at ease in private than in public life. In the harsh world of South African politics he had his bearing; in the family sphere he often seemed baffled and lost.
Happily for his country, one did not drain energy from the other. Thanks to a kind of self-imposed apartheid of the mind, personal anguish and the political drive inhabited separate compartments and ran along parallel lines.
As out of control as she could be in her personal affairs, she possessed a lucid political intelligence and a mature understanding of where her husband’s priorities lay, even if she was deluded in attributing some of his qualities to herself.
“When you lead the kind of life we lead, if you are involved in a revolutionary situation, you cease to think in terms of self,” she said. “The question of personal feelings and reactions dues not even arise, because you are in a position where you think solely in terms of the nation, the people who have come first all your life.”
•Courtesy: Kenya today News and Analysis
Extracted from Knowing Mandela by John Carlin

MORE OF THESE STORIES AND OPINIONS SUMMARISED CLICK HERE.

Friday, 13 December 2013

WHY THE CURRENT STRIKE BY MEDICAL STAFF IS INEVITABLE? GOVERNMENT MUST RESPOND IN TIME, OR ELSE.......


In this life it has always been that whether in plenty or in scarcity the poor always suffer at the mercy of the royals whom they enthroned. This has not been an exception in the Kenyan setting, as that is what has been being perpetrated from one regime to the other by those in power. It has come to be a norm of this society that for government to give you a listening ear you have to get to the streets and shout on top of your voice. This is usually then accompanied by intimidations, which of course rarely work, mass destruction of property and then finally the government always give in to the demands.
And So Kenyans have known this is the style.
ECHOES FROM THE PAST
From the recent past, Teachers recorded the longest ever strike in the country  this year. They were given all kinds of threats even at one time being told they had been sacked. Their leaders ended in remand for some hours after they were heavily fined. Sarcastically and shamefully, after the government had kept the country in turmoil of teachers for that long, they later gave in to their demands. Another gimmick occurred when The MPS boycotted parliament sittings on the pretext that Salaries and remuneration Commission(SRC) had bridged it's boundaries by setting for them salaries. After several nights of unnecessary noises hear and there, they were given what they wanted.
The MCAs have been paralyzing the activities of counties in the recent past when they wanted salary increase. These are just but few examples.
Same events date back to earlier governments. It can be clearly remembered that when teachers went on rampage by then The Late Hon Mutula Kilonzo, Fare Thee Well, was the minister of education, it came to be a cliché that government didn't have money. What surprised many was when from nowhere they teachers were given what they wanted just in minutes.
The former minister for Medical Services Hon. Prof. Anyang' Nyong'o broke the record when he threatened to sack all the doctors after they went on industrial action. But what happened at last?
COMPENSATION
After all these mentioned strikes and others, the participants especially in the education sector have always moved swiftly and compensated for the time lost. This has always been done by extending term dates, semester dates for colleges, postponing exams and for other sectors probably increasing working hours.
However, unless stated otherwise, when Nurses went on rampage and lives lost, when doctors and specialists did same and lives lost, I never HEARD, that is if it was ever announced, that now the lost lives would be compensated for. The families of the departed souls consoled each other in the bushes and silently sent their loved ones under the six feet sand. The government always went silent in such cases and to date no consolation ever, Never came out.
LEARNING FROM THE PAST.
It is always good that when something wrong happens, we learn from it and forge a correct new beginning from there. It is however sad and mentally devastating to note that our government that we are always proud of and encouraged to be proud of never learn from this painful past. This is clearly seen how they have handled the status quo in the health sector since the medical staff went on rampage.
As the country celebrated the 50 years anniversary, NO single National government leader showed sympathy nor empathy for the prevailing situation.
If at all the government had any memory and knowledge of improving on past failures, they should have realized that whether they sack all the doctors or not, COME WHAT MAY, they shalt not reverse the lives of those who have succumbed to nature after they lacked medical attention.
PREVAILING CONDITION IN COUNTIES.
As this happens, it is also sarcastic to learn of what is going on in the counties.
In one of the counties, it is reported that the county government is giving each patient 1000/=. I simply ask, for how long will they do this?
Is 1000/= even enough to treat Malaria alone.
Do they know the cost of kidney dialysis?
It is reported that governor Mandago in Uasin Gishu County has ordered closure of all private clinics run by doctors. Out of frying pan into the fire, Hata afadhali mwenye kupeana Elfu Moja, (Better that one giving 1000/=). After closure of this private clinics will Mandago walk door by door treating patients. Because what we know is that for him he can fly anytime to Uganda or even egypt, get treatment and jet back in the coutry. He has a private doctor whom he can order to reach the house immediately and treat him moreso.
In other places of course quack medics will be deployed as in others the deaths numbers shall of course be hidden from the media.
PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE.
It is to my knowledge that all medical staff are people who posses love for human life at heart. It is therefore evident that the government is subjecting this lot to mental torture and psychological traumatisation by forcing them to let people die when they are in this country. It is a desire of no medical staff to see a patient die before he or she exploits all possible available means. Based on this, it is not therefore debatable that these staff are suffering a great deal to tolerate the current condition.
It is high time that the government rise up and do the necessary.
Medical staff don't want salary increment, they don't want to inflate the government wage bill like some greedy, thirsty politicians we know who have already done that.
There priority is struggle for an ample environment for provision of quality health services.
It is time that all right minded individuals rise up and call the government to wake up to reality and do the necessary for the good of the future.
The future shall judge us who live in the present. From these deaths, orphans are remaining behind, widows and widowers are left and disease index is of course going up.
Who shall be our Saviour?